n8n Review: The Free Self-Hosted Edition Is the Real Product
n8n is worth it if someone on your team can run a Docker container: the self-hosted Community Edition is free and uncapped, and n8n Cloud starts at 20€/month billed annually for 2,500 executions (verified Aug 12, 2026). Skip it if nobody there touches a terminal, if you need shared credentials and projects (667€/month Business) or SSO (Enterprise only, no published price), or if you plan to resell a hosted instance as your own product, which the licence forbids.
This n8n review is consensus-scored and document-verified, not first-hand-tested. We read every plan and every row of the feature table on n8n’s own pricing page on August 12, 2026, read the full Sustainable Use Licence from the n8n repository the same day, worked through five r/n8n, r/automation and r/selfhosted threads comment by comment, and priced three alternatives on their own checkouts. Where we haven’t run the tool ourselves, we say so and mark what still needs a screenshot.
Our verdict: 8.7 / 10. Updated August 2026.
The verdict box
| Rating | 8.7 / 10 |
| One-line verdict | The best automation engine you can run for nothing — and one of the most expensive the moment two people need to share a credential. |
| Price | Community Edition self-hosted: free. Cloud Starter 20€/mo, Pro 50€/mo, Business 667€/mo, all billed annually. Enterprise quote-gated. (verified Aug 12, 2026) |
| Best for | Technical teams running AI-heavy or high-volume workflows who want per-execution billing and an exit hatch nobody can switch off. |
| ANTI-PICK — do not buy if | You have nobody comfortable with Docker, a webhook and an API key. Also skip it if you need shared credentials and projects and can’t sign a 667€/month Business contract; if you need SSO, which n8n’s feature table shows only under Enterprise, at a price it won’t publish; if you run six figures of executions a month, where no published tier exists; or if you’re an agency planning to sell clients access to your n8n instance, which the licence does not allow. |
n8n pricing: what it actually costs (verified August 12, 2026)
Start with the detail most reviews bury: on n8n’s pricing page the annual view is pre-selected and every card prints “billed annually” under the price. The toggle reads “Annually (Save 17%)”. These are discounted rates, not what you pay month to month.
| Plan | Price (verified Aug 12, 2026) | Executions/mo | Hosting | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community Edition | Free (you pay for the server) | Uncapped — your hardware is the limit | Self-hosted | Solo builders, internal automation, anyone with a $10 VPS |
| Starter | 20€/mo, billed annually | 2,500 | Hosted by n8n | Trying Cloud without an ops burden |
| Pro | 50€/mo, billed annually | 10,000 | Hosted by n8n | Solo builders and small teams in production |
| Business | 667€/mo, billed annually | 40,000 | Self-hosted | Sub-100-person companies that need collaboration features |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | Custom | Cloud or self-hosted | SSO SAML/LDAP, audit logging, 365+ days of workflow history, 200+ concurrent executions |
Three structural things matter more than the numbers.
First, n8n bills per completed execution, not per step. Its own page says it plainly: “Pricing based on monthly workflow executions, regardless of complexity,” with unlimited steps on every tier. A forty-node workflow costs the same to run as a three-node one. Zapier meters tasks and Make meters credits, so both get more expensive as your workflows get smarter. n8n doesn’t. For AI-heavy work that classifies, enriches, branches, retries and writes, that’s the whole ballgame.
Second, the gap between Pro and Business is a cliff, not a step. You go from 50€ to 667€ a month, a 13x jump, and what you’re buying is not more executions (10K to 40K) but permission to work as a team. There is no tier between them.
Third, and this is the part nobody else writes down: the feature table has no Business column. It compares Starter, Pro and Enterprise. The plan costing 667€ a month is the one plan whose capabilities you cannot look up. SSO SAML and LDAP, audit logging, git version control, unlimited shared projects and 365+ days of history all sit in the Enterprise column, and whether any of them ship at 667€ is a question only a salesperson can answer. Read the table literally and SSO isn’t something you can buy at a published price at all.
One honest gap: we could not render the monthly-billed prices. The toggle is client-side, and a static fetch always returns the annual view. A 17% discount implies numbers you can do in your head, but n8n doesn’t print them and we won’t invent them, so it’s flagged for a browser capture before publish. Everything else here was read off the vendor’s own table: Starter carries 1 day of workflow history and 5 concurrent executions; Pro, 5 days and 20; Enterprise, 365+ days and 200+.
Ask about the startup discount before you sign anything. n8n’s pricing FAQ carries a “Do you offer a discount for startups?” entry, still there on Aug 12, 2026. When we captured that answer for our workflow automation hub on August 5 it read 50% off Business for companies under twenty employees, subject to qualifying, which puts the category’s most alarming headline number at roughly 334€ a month. The accordion didn’t expand on our August 12 fetch, so treat the 50% as an August 5 reading rather than a live one.
What n8n does well
Per-execution billing that rewards complexity. ✔️ It’s the reason technical teams migrate, so it’s worth saying twice. The top answer in the r/automation thread that pits all three against each other ranks n8n on exactly this: “Self-host for free, super customizable with nodes. Great for devs. Steeper learning curve, but unbeatable value long-term.” That’s an 8-point comment in a 28-comment thread, not a landslide. A reply underneath carries the condition that follows n8n everywhere: “N8N 💯% but it has to be deployed yourself.” (r/automation, Oct 17, 2025)
The free edition is a real product, not a demo. ✔️ One person running automation for a 100-person org described their setup in r/n8n as “self-hosted n8n (Community Edition) on a cheap $10/month VPS using Docker. It works great and honestly I get a lot of joy from keeping it cheap.” (r/n8n, Dec 14, 2025) An engineer in the same thread reported running self-hosted production infrastructure “saving at least $25,000/year.”
✔️ You can drop into code anywhere. JavaScript and Python nodes, custom HTTP and GraphQL requests, cURL import, CLI and API control, plus bash scripts and custom nodes once you self-host. It’s a visual tool that never traps you in the visual layer, which is why developers who bounce off Zapier stay here.
Nobody can switch it off. ✔️ The source is on GitHub, and n8n’s own site displayed 200,357 stars when we read it on August 12, 2026, against 199,270 on August 5 in our hub’s record. The counter ticks upward by the hour, so read the direction rather than the digits. Self-hosted, your automations survive a price change or an acquisition: Relay.app, a ranked competitor in this same category, stopped accepting signups on July 16, 2026 and deletes paid accounts on September 14 (verified Aug 6, 2026). That is the risk running your own server removes.
✔️ The ratings are strong, with a caveat about ours rather than theirs. G2 shows 4.7 out of 5 across roughly 300 reviews, but we read that off Google’s rich snippet on Aug 12, 2026 rather than on G2 itself, so treat the review count as approximate until someone opens the page.
Where n8n falls short
The execution ceiling has no upstairs. ❌ Business tops out at 40,000 executions a month. When n8n restructured pricing, one user posted in r/n8n: “Having to downgrade to community. We were running nearly 500k executions per month on the startup plan and are now completely screwed. We’ll likely look for a different platform long term.” They added: “We were happy to pay money for it, but now we will move away… kind-of the Broadcom model it feels like a bit.” (r/n8n, Aug 14, 2025) If your volume is high, your only published options are free-and-self-managed or a quote.
Community Edition can’t do teamwork. ❌ The sharpest criticism in the record comes from someone who is recommending n8n at the time. In the 100-person-org thread: “The moment you want actual collaboration, self-hosted falls apart: No shared workflows. No shared credentials. No projects. No real access control.” Another commenter says what sharing one login means in practice, “everyone with the n8n login has access to all of your credentials”, and adds that Community keeps only 24 hours of rollback. The fix is a Business licence even if you keep hosting it yourself, which the first commenter prices at “roughly €800/month” against n8n’s listed 667€ billed annually. (r/n8n, Dec 14, 2025)
It is not open source, and the licence line is genuinely blurry. ❌ n8n ships under the Sustainable Use Licence (we read it in full on Aug 12, 2026). The operative sentence: “You may use or modify the software only for your own internal business purposes or for non-commercial or personal use.” What “internal business purposes” means for an agency automating a client’s stack is nowhere defined. The most-shared licence explainer on r/n8n opens with “A TON of folks are building ‘automation platforms’ using n8n, only to unknowingly violate their licensing.” It sits at 254 points, 94% upvoted, across 94 comments, and the argument never resolves. Nobody in it speaks for n8n GmbH. (r/n8n, Aug 12, 2025) Selling access to your hosted instance is clearly out. Everything short of that is a judgement call you’re making unadvised.
“Free” ends where identity management begins. ❌ In r/selfhosted, the complaint that draws the most agreement isn’t about capability: “Because of course SSO and permissions are core features, the enterprise subscription is the lowest viable tier.” (r/selfhosted, Jan 9, 2025) n8n’s own pricing table backs that complaint rather than refuting it. SSO SAML and LDAP sit in the Enterprise column and nowhere else. The counter-argument in the same thread, that paid features are what fund the free ones, is fair. It still leaves a five-person shop needing SAML with no price it can look up.
It assumes a technical owner. ❌ Not everyone loves the editor. From the same thread: “Tried many times, always come back to Node Red within a day or two. N8n is bloated, slow, and doesn’t do anything unique.” Neither that nor the Windmill defections are majority views. Both are real.
Who should skip n8n
Skip it if nobody on the team is comfortable with Docker, a reverse proxy and an API key. The Cloud tiers remove the server, not the learning curve, and Zapier exists precisely for this buyer.
Skip it if you need shared credentials and granular permissions and 667€ a month isn’t in the budget. Skip it twice if what you need is SSO, because n8n lists SAML under Enterprise only and won’t publish a number for it. A commenter in the 100-person-org thread describes the interim state exactly: you spend months compensating for the missing features with process, discipline and manual overhead, and then you pay anyway.
Skip it if you’re building an automation agency whose product is access to n8n. That’s the one thing the licence unambiguously forbids; give each client their own instance instead.
And skip it if you run enormous execution volume without an engineer to self-host. No published tier fits you.
n8n alternatives worth pricing (2026)
| Tool | Best for | Standout | Starting price (verified Aug 12, 2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| n8n | Technical teams, AI-heavy workflows | Per-execution billing; genuinely self-hostable | Free self-hosted; Cloud 20€/mo billed annually |
| Make | The cheapest real paid tier | Visual builder, credit metering | $0 (1,000 credits/mo); Core $9/mo at 10k credits |
| Zapier | Non-technical owners, widest app coverage | Breadth of integrations | $0 free; paid from $19.99/mo |
| Activepieces | Self-hosting without the licence anxiety | No paywalled pieces, per user reports | $0; paid from $16/mo |
The honest one-liners:
- Choose Make if the bill is the deciding factor and your workflows are short. At $9 a month for 10,000 credits it’s the cheapest paid entry in the category, but credits meter steps, so complexity costs you.
- Zapier is the call when the person maintaining these automations isn’t an engineer, or when you need an integration nobody else carries. Task metering punishes AI-heavy work. The app coverage is still unmatched.
- Choose Activepieces if self-hosting is the point and the licence makes you nervous. A CTO in the r/selfhosted thread called it “way more user friendly than n8n and node-red,” with “none of the pieces paywalled.” A second user in that thread found the opposite, saying a workflow that took a day in Activepieces took “a couple of hours” in n8n.
- Node-RED and Windmill are the two names actual n8n leavers give: Node-RED for long-running and IoT-shaped flows, Windmill for developers who’d rather write the integration than drag it. Neither was priced or licence-checked this session, so both carry
(verify).
Full field, all seven scored: AI workflow automation tools. Every verdict we’ve published sits in tool reviews, and the price index is at AI tool pricing. If your automation is really about code, start at AI coding assistants instead.
Why you can trust this n8n review
We hold no product in this category and take no placement money. For this review we read n8n’s pricing page and every row of its feature table on August 12, 2026; pulled the Sustainable Use Licence from the n8n repository rather than a summary of it; read five Reddit threads comment by comment, being the pricing revolt, the 100-person-org cost thread, the licence explainer, the three-way r/automation comparison and the r/selfhosted complaint thread; and priced Make, Zapier and Activepieces on their own pages the same day. Every quote was transcribed from a live fetch and carries its link and date. The rating is our judgement on that evidence. What we have not done is run a controlled workflow test on our own instance. That comparison is queued as a test artifact, and this page carries the screenshots before it’s treated as final. Method lives on how we test AI tools; the no-paid-placement rules are on our independence charter.
FAQ
Is n8n really free?
The self-hosted Community Edition is free with no execution cap — you pay only for the server, and users run it happily on $10-a-month VPS boxes. It is not open source, though: it ships under the Sustainable Use Licence, which permits internal business use but forbids reselling n8n as a service. Cloud starts at 20€/month billed annually.
Is n8n worth it compared to Zapier and Make?
It depends who maintains the workflows. n8n bills once per completed execution no matter how many steps run, so complex AI workflows stay cheap. Zapier meters every task and Make meters credits, so both get pricier as workflows get smarter. If nobody on the team is technical, Zapier’s higher price buys back the time n8n costs you.
Can I use n8n to build and sell automations for clients?
Charging to design, build and maintain workflows on a client’s own n8n instance is standard practice and widely read as compliant. Selling clients access to your hosted instance, or white-labelling n8n inside your product, needs an Enterprise or Embedded licence. The licence never defines “internal business purposes” — read it yourself and take advice.
Bottom line
n8n is the rare tool where paying nothing is the sophisticated choice, not the cheap one. Run the Community Edition on a $10 VPS, bill per execution instead of per step, and you get an automation engine no vendor can price you out of or shut down. What you’re really deciding is whether you can live at the free tier’s edges: one shared login, 24 hours of rollback, no projects. The next stop is 667€ a month with nothing in between, and if the thing you actually need is SSO, the stop after that has no price printed on it at all. Technical team, get it today. Non-technical team, the honest answer is that Zapier costs more and will cost you less.
Changelog
- 2026-08-12 — QA and humanization pass, second reader. n8n.io/pricing re-fetched independently: Starter 20€, Pro 50€, Business 667€ (all “billed annually”), 2.5K/10K/40K executions, “Annually (Save 17%)” toggle, Starter 1 day of history and 5 concurrent executions, Enterprise 365+ and 200+ — every figure matched. One substantive correction. The draft asserted in five places that SSO ships on the 667€ Business plan; n8n’s feature table has no Business column at all and lists SSO SAML and LDAP only under Enterprise, so the answer block, verdict box, anti-pick, skip section and bottom line were rewritten to say SSO carries no published price. That reading is now also stated on the page as the third structural point about n8n’s pricing. Two Reddit threads re-fetched and every quote re-transcribed against the live render: the 100-person-org thread (collaboration, credentials, 24-hour rollback, “roughly €800/month”) and the r/automation three-way, which the draft cited without a link. The link was added, the thread added to sources, and its weight stated honestly at 8 points in a 28-comment thread. The licence explainer was re-fetched and linked; the unverifiable claim that its commenters were “40+ people, none of them lawyers” was replaced with the thread’s real numbers (254 points, 94% upvoted, 94 comments). The GitHub star counter read 200,357, against 200,352 in the draft, and the page now says the counter moves hourly. The Start-up Plan’s “50% off Business” was re-attributed to its August 5 capture after the pricing-page accordion failed to expand on this fetch. Relay.app is now named as the competitor that stopped taking signups. No score changed.
- 2026-08-12 — Page created. All n8n plan prices, execution allowances and feature-table rows verified live on n8n.io/pricing; Sustainable Use Licence read in full from the n8n GitHub repository; GitHub star count read on n8n.io at 200,352; Make, Zapier and Activepieces pricing verified on their own pages; four Reddit threads fetched in full with quotes transcribed and dates captured. Monthly-billed rates, G2 counts and Windmill/Node-RED pricing flagged for re-verification.
Independent, no paid placements. See our how we test method and independence charter.