Entire has opened a Git hosting service designed around coding agents instead of people typing commits, and it claims pushes run up to 89 times faster than on GitHub. Thomas Dohmke, the company’s co-founder and CEO, announced the product on Entire’s blog on 26 October. The service is live in the US, the EU, Australia, and India.
The most visible change is the review screen. Entire argues that the pull request has turned into a long log of agent chatter that nobody but another agent reads, which leaves the human unable to judge whether a change is safe. Its replacement, called a Trail, puts eval scores at the top of the page and recalculates them on every push. Each review agent runs separately in a cloud sandbox and returns a score plus a written rationale.
Entire says its own repositories use three evals, named Security, Slop, and a flag for when a human must look. When the Slop score turns orange, a developer can tell the coding agent to keep fixing and pushing until it turns green. Repo owners can switch on Gates that block a merge until findings are closed, humans have approved, and CI checks pass. The reviewers run on Claude Code and Codex inside sandboxes from Daytona and E2B, so the product depends on the same model vendors its customers already pay.
The speed claim comes from Entire’s own open-source benchmark. It lists 418 pushes per second for Entire, 65 for Cursor, 15 for Pierre, 10 for GitLab, and 4.7 for GitHub. Entire attributes the gap to a new server written to speak Git, storing objects across many machines, with a separate transactional database tracking refs. Independent numbers are not in the post, and a vendor-run benchmark of its own product deserves a rerun before anyone budgets around it.
Where the repository lives is the other pitch. Teams can replicate a project across several regions or pin it to one for data residency. They can also mirror a GitHub repo and keep GitHub as the source of truth. In that mode, if GitHub has an outage, Entire keeps serving clones and fetches, and agents can push to branches prefixed entire/unmirrored/ until service returns. For anyone leaving GitHub, the post describes a detach button, an entire-migrate plug-in, or a plain fetch and push.
Entire also ships what it calls Continuous Memory, two open-source, local-first commands. The first, entire-graph, builds a map of a repository (definitions, callers, types, routes, change impact) using tree-sitter without network calls, and Entire says it saved up to 71 percent on tokens in its testing. The second, entire-brain, indexes past agent sessions stored in Git history and ties them to that map, so a new session can recover why code looks the way it does. Connected to Entire’s backend, those memories are shared across a team and appear inside each Trail.
On CI, Entire launches with Buildkite and Depot. Buildkite users get a failing build that blocks the merge, and a bk pipeline convert command for moving GitHub Actions workflows. Depot offers depot ci migrate for the same job and bills by the second.
The post does not give pricing for Entire itself. That omission, plus a mirror mode that keeps GitHub in place, shows the strategy: make the first step cheap and reversible. GitHub’s real hold on teams is the habit of reviewing in pull requests, and Trails is the feature that tests whether that habit breaks.
A team running heavy agent traffic can mirror one active repository this week and compare push times and Trail scores against its current setup before moving anything.
Reported by Entire’s blog on 26 October 2026.
